❴PDF❵ ✍ Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive? Author Christopher Booker – Saudionline.co.uk

Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive? pdf Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?, ebook Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?, epub Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?, doc Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?, e-pub Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?, Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive? 2f0e1ec1170 With The Publication Of The New European Constitution, Authors Have Condensed Some Of The Early History In Order To Make Space For An Examination Of The New European Constitution And To Argue That In It Are All The Tricks And Traps At The Heart Of This European Idea And The Disastrous Consequences

10 thoughts on “Great Deception : Can the European Union Survive?

  1. says:

    First off, I know that most people see the title and think, another EU Conspiracy Theory But like most books, they contain conclusion opinions based off of facts Not to say that I agree with the conclusions or theories pieced together based on those facts, but the facts in this book themselves are fascinating I really enjoyed this book because it sheds light on something European Union we all know of, have heard about and for those of us born after the fact it is something that has always just been there But what is it Where did it come from Sure I ve read and heard the sales pitch from our salesperson authority figures, but who came up with this idea, really Do you know Do you want to know Favorite Quote a forth man, Paul Henri Spaak, a prime minister of Belgium, also made his own crucial contribution It was he who urged on his friend Monnet the idea that, initially, the most effective way to disguise their project s political purpose was to conceal it behind a pretence that it was concerned only with economic co operation, based on dismantling trade barriers a common market HmmmDid I mention that you should read the CFR report, Building a North American Community

  2. says:

    I read the 2005 edition of this scholarly book that revealed the long term deceptions by many national leaders and behind the scenes operators intent on trapping the nations of Europe into a political unification by convincing the people of the nations chosen to be included that what was being done all along was just the building of a common market or free trade between nations to bring them prosperity All the while the true intent was to build economic union as a precursor to political union National independence would thus be sacrificed to a new supranational government without most of the citizens of the nations involved knowing what was being done to the It s often slow reading, but It begins in the World War I time frame so there s much to be covered.

  3. says:

    This is simply not the same book post Brexit I began reading this in 2014 honestly never thought it just around the corner I was simply interested in a critical look at the wonderful, ambitious project, hyped up by commentators to be creating an unprecedented quality of life fueled by benevolent, peaceful, supranational cooperation The fact that the UK chose to leave a future utopia, hints that it is nothing of the sort, but that skeptical British attitude to the project as highlighted in this book, is very old and ultimately Brexit, while it was very unlikely, does fit into a very recognizable historical pattern In contrast, if a prominent, continental power which has been core to the project from the very beginning such as France were to leave, that would be something much unprecedented, and at that point one could begin their draft of the EU s obituary The book begins as a general history of the European Union though later chapters make it clearthat this is a history of the UK s relationship with the European Union and a critical one at that.I enjoyed reading about the efforts to unite Europe which go back centuries, though they really didn t become a possibility until after the First World War, and honestly what else was Europe supposed to do after so much devastation It was a natural reaction, and it seemed then that there was a possibility of fulfilling a dream that went back to medieval times The League of Nations set up an institutional framework that the US refused to join, leaving it a mainly European organization, a possible nucleus to future integration efforts The point that this books makes is that such a phase in the history of the EU has been largely forgotten because of the ominous implications that such idealistic dreams can fall apart before the force of unpredictable geopolitical events The official story as I heard on US cable news shortly after Brexit is that the EU was born after World War II, catalyzed by Winston Churchill s famous United States of Europe speech, in 1946 The book claims that Churchill had in mind a continental union, not including Britain shorn of it s Empire, having to join the European Community to maintain it s influence and prestige, interesting and plausible claims that I would like to investigate The rest of the book is a straightforward history of UK integration into the European project, it s ups and downs A running theme being that supporters of the project tend to downplay integration and merely pretend that the EU is a means of easing international cooperation involving no real loss of sovereignty to member states I m not caught up in European politics enough to know how much of the general public believes the EU s end to be a United States of Europe, an actual superstate, but I do recall John Gunther in 1961 s Inside Europe today, understanding the goal of the European Community to be the latter The book ends comparing the EU to the ugly, drab architecture of Le Corbusier, another product of the experimental, utopian mood of the 1920s It hasn t been long at all since I first picked this up, but there s been quite a few surprises since then and I expect there to be Only time will tellhow many chapters this book is missing.

  4. says:

    Now published with a new preface explaining why The Great Deception is of the utmost importance today as it was when it was first published and to coincide with Great Britain s EU referendum in 2016, this book suggests that the United States of Europe and its edict of ever closer union have been based on a colossal confidence trick The Great Deception tells for the first time the inside story of the most audacious political project of modern times the plan to unite Europe under a single supranational government From the 1920s, when the blueprint for the European Union was first conceived by a British civil servant, this meticulously documented account takes the story right up to the moves to give Europe a political constitution, already planned 60 years ago to be the crowning dream of the whole project The book shows how the gradual assembling of a European government has amounted to a slow motion coup d etat , based on a strategy of deliberate deception, into which Britain s leaders, Macmillan and Heath, were consciously drawn Drawing on a wealth of new evidence, scarcely an episode of the story does not emerge in startling new light, from the real reasons why de Gaulle kept Britain out in the 1960s to the fall of Mrs Thatcher The book chillingly shows how Britain s politicians, not least Tony Blair, were consistently outplayed in a game the rules of which they never understood But it ends by asking whether, from the euro to enlargement, the project has now overreached itself, as a gamble doomed to fail Since their collaboration began in 1992, Christopher Booker, a Sunday Telegraph columnist, and Richard North, who worked for four years in Brussels and Strasbourg as a senior researcher, have won a unique reputation for their expertise on Britain s relationship to the European Union Their previous publications included The Mad Officials 1994 and The Castle of Lies 1996 But they regard The Great Deception as the book they had been waiting to write for ten years Christopher Booker s preface now adds up to date detail for the current era as Britain heads inexorably towards a possible Brexit.

  5. says:

    A brick of a book that holds open the door to the inception and aspiration of the EU, and importantly its affect and influence.It s presented in chronological format with smaller sub headings which break down each chapter into digestible sections It begins with The Birth of an Idea 1918 1932 and travels through time until we reach Collision with Reality 2004 2005 The text provides clarity from an entirely British perspective of successive leader s perceived achievements and momentous failures while stumbling down the rocky road of membership.One thing I was astounded to learn was exactly how long the original EU idea had been brewing before it was brought into the public eye, and how only a minute part of its ambition was shared with said public I d only planned to dip into this between other books But my interest was quickly piqued and I found myself binge reading large portions of it And there s also an abundance of annotations all clearly indicated on every page, if that s your thing.

  6. says:

    This detailed account is probably the best accurate history of the European Union out there It is heavily critical of the project, of course, but that is essential to bypass the mythology and get to what really has occurred in Europe since the 1920s The downside is that the careful, documented detail means the book is not as pleasant a read as the author s fine prose could have made itI would also say that the author might have allowed for conflicting agendas in the overall story than he presents I suspect that whilst there has been a Supranational agenda from the start it has not always been desired by all those who helped advance it Booker expertly lays out the facts but slightly oversimplifies when it comes to his overall interpretative thesis.Finally, after reading this I am even ecstatic that we voted to leave this monstrously undemocratic creature Liked it a lot.

  7. says:

    The authors offer an insight on the European union I voted to stay as I m attracted to the idea that trading prevents wars What supports that notion Just a gut feeling unsupported by any real evidence whatsoever As I write this review the May government is being treated by Junkers, Michel Barnier and the other combatants, as both the enemy and a cash cow Nowhere is there a sense of a future relationship, a positive contribution to a progressive Europe.This book helps the reader to understand the personalities who became the midwives to the EU project, and where it became that the sum of its parts, and therefore a monster that needed to be tethered.

  8. says:

    Loved this book A chunky history of dysfunctional nature of EU integration It s such a shame the Brexit referendum was hijacked by the immigration debate The failings of its political structures and bureaucracy, and the relentless march towards hegemony as exposed in this study are the best reasons to want out.

  9. says:

    Rollicking good, page turning thriller, ending on an agonising cliffhanger Really want to find out if the baddies managed to fully consolidate their stranglehold with a constitution Or if the goodies finally manage to emancipate themselves from the bureaucratic tyranny of the Franco German Empire Eagerly awaiting the sequel.

  10. says:

    Europe The Franco German carve up.This book, well researched, will open your eyes to what the EU is really all about Our politicians should hang their heads in shame at the blatant deceptions inflicted on the general public Oh for some honest MPs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *