❰Read❯ ➱ The Fate of the Romanovs Author Greg King – Saudionline.co.uk

The Fate of the Romanovs files The Fate of the Romanovs, read online The Fate of the Romanovs, free The Fate of the Romanovs, free The Fate of the Romanovs, The Fate of the Romanovs 764044ba5 Abundant, Newly Discovered Sources Shatter Long Held BeliefsThe Collapse Of The Soviet Union In Revealed, Among Many Other Things, A Hidden Wealth Of Archival Documents Relating To The Imprisonment And Eventual Murder Of Tsar Nicholas II, His Wife Alexandra, And Their Children Emanating From Sources Both Within And Close To The Imperial Family As Well As From Their Captors And Executioners, These Often Controversial Materials Have Enabled A New And Comprehensive Examination Of One The Pivotal Events Of The Twentieth Century And The Many Controversies That Surround ItBased On A Careful Analysis Of Than Of These Previously Unpublished Documents, Along With Numerous Newly Discovered Photos, The Fate Of The Romanovs Makes Compelling Revisions To Many Long Held Beliefs About The Romanovs Final Months And Moments This Powerful Account Includes Surprising Evidence That Anastasia May, Indeed, Have Survived Diary Entries Made By Nicholas And Alexandra During Their Captivity Revelations Of How The Romanovs Were Betrayed By Trusted Servants A Reconstruction Of Daily Life Among The Prisoners At Ipatiev House Strong Evidence That The Romanovs Were Not Brutalized By Their Captors Statements From Admitted Participants In The Murders

10 thoughts on “The Fate of the Romanovs

  1. says:

    The recently deceased theologian Richard John Neuhaus once wrote We are born to die Not that death is the purpose of our being born, but we are born toward death, and in each of our lives the work of dying is already underway I picked up this book because, like every other human who has walked, is walking, and will walk this earth, I am going to die It is the greatest journey, one with no survivors What people dismiss as morbidity is actually curiosity what s out there, beyond this vale I mention this, because The Fate of the Romanovs is the story of the death of a family Tsar Nicholas II of Russia Empress Alexandria, his wife and their children Alexei, Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria The book is, for the most part, shorn of historical context In the grand scheme, the death of the Romanovs is a mere footnote By the time they died, their contribution to history was already complete The Russo Japanese War was over the 1905 Revolution was over Russia had withdrawn from World War I a civil war between Reds and Whites had erupted Rasputin was dead and Nicholas had abdicated Yet the fascination remains It s the story of a family who once had everything the world s largest empire and ended in a basement, shot and bayonetted by peasants Then there s the whole Anastasia thing I don t believe that people are interested in the Romanovs execution because Anastasia was reputed to survive to the contrary, I think people wanted to believe in Anastasia because the Romanovs fate is so incredible We don t want to believe an entire royal family can disappear we need to believe there was a Job, that one alone escaped to tell the story The Fate of the Romanovs is a micro history of sorts The first half of the book is a moment by moment, bullet by bullet account of the execution The historical context is broadly drawn If you want to read all the ins and outs of what led Nicholas to his death house in Ekaterinburg, you ll do well to go somewhere else I recommend Massey s Nicholas and Alexandra I enjoyed the first half, focusing on the captivity and murders of the Romanovs The execution itself is told in riveting detail the family, some seated, some standing, riddled with bullets the hemophiliac Alexei, the boy who brought down the throne, being smashed with rifle butts bullets bouncing off Maria s chest, because her mother had sewn the royal jewels into her dress chubby Anastasia shot in the head as she cowered in a corner one of the murderers fondling the Tsarina s breasts It is all very hideous and gripping Then comes the second half of the book, which was putatively about the lingering myths and legends of the Romanovs, especially the Anastasia The book goes into the Anne Anderson and the whole Anastasia myth This is odd, I thought Just twenty pages before, the authors had described Anastasia being shot, gangland style, in her head Now, for whatever reason, the authors appeared to be discrediting their own account, which was based largely on the so called Yurovsky Memoirs It got shocking Apparently, the authors don t believe Anastasia was killed in that basement despite describing a scene in which 1 she was killed and 2 no one could have escaped They base this on the fact that little Anastasia was not found buried with the other family members, nor in the area Long story short, I got duped into reading a crazy Anastasia is alive book Which is bunk The authors completely discount the Yurovsky Memoir, in which Yurovksy said two of the children were buried some distance away Guess what Last year, he was proven right Anastasia died that day, along with three sisters, a brother, and her mom and dad Now she can rest in peace And you don t have to read this book though you might want to read the first half, just for its grim detail, which is a superior retelling than Massey in Nicholas and Alexandria and The Romanovs The Final Chapter.

  2. says:

    I ve had this book for over two years, and just barely finished it This book was really interesting, but it s long over 400 pages , and written like a research paper I would recommend this book to anyone who is already familiar with the Romanov family, because this goes into fantastic detail about their captivity, murder, and the discovery of their bodies Background knowledge is essential to understanding this book.

  3. says:

    LONG REVIEW AHEAD I ve been reading this book over a span of two years well, with month long gaps in between so I ve spent a lot of time with it Hopefully this review will help me get my thoughts out I ll split this review up into a Pros Cons section, because I really do think it has both Rating 2.5 stars PROS 1 Information on revolutionaries guards There are so many books on the Romanov family that at this point they have little new information to offer And since I first became interested in the Romanovs almost ten years ago, I ve read a lot However, I really did not know much about the revolutionaries with whom the Romanovs interacted Granted, information about Kerensky and Lenin is easier to come by, but other revolutionaries are only briefly described as drunkards , or, in the case of Yurovsky, as cold The information provided on Avdayev and Yurovsky was quite interesting, but I especially enjoyed learning about the young soldiers in their late teens and early twenties who guarded the family The most enjoyable chapter in the book is called A Happy Hour with the Grandest People in the World Even if you opt not to read the book, I suggest you read that chapter 2 Attention paid to NA s flaws examination of white army Reading the memoirs of white migr s obviously influences one s perspective on the Romanovs, as does the dichotomy of their fairytale like lives and their nightmarish end in Ekaterinburg This book does a good job of exposing the royal family s flaws, even the children though, ofc, their flaws were a result of simply being human For example, prior to this book I didn t know of Nicholas anti semitism The book also describes the brutality of the White Army during the Civil War, which is a topic I hadn t seen addressed before but was glad to see brought to light 3 The servants One of the big pluses for this book, IMO, is getting to know about the side players The Romanovs servants even those who died with them are rarely given much attention This book devoted time to them, as well as to their fates after their murder alongside the imperial family It s very saddening that class structure lives on and they have not been given the same respect as the Romanovs, despite the fact that their loyalty was the reason for their deaths 4 Learning about the aftermath I d actually not read much about the aftermath of the murders Lucky me, half of this book is dedicated to just that It turned out to be overkill IMO, but the book did explain the Russian Church s stance it still refuses to accept the bodies found in 1991 as those of the Romanovs FOTR also explains the DNA work done as well as the differing opinions of the American and Russian teams i.e was Anastasia missing or not Unfortunately, I did feel the authors were REALLY against the Russian team and devoted way too much time to trying to persuade readers to share their opinion It felt rather one sided and was somewhat annoyingwhich brings me to the cons CONS 1 Controversy over new information I checked the notes at the back of the book periodically to see where the authors were getting their information There have been a lot of questions as to the reliability of the sources and or the translation of those sources Threads on the Alexander Palace Forum go into detail on this Ultimately, this is ofc the biggest problem with the book with allegations of betrayal among imperial staff, the rape of OTMA on the Rus, an affair with a guard at the Ipatiev House, and the authors clear favour of Yurovsky other revolutionaries over the Romanovs, you re obviously going to need strong facts to sway your readers Otherwise, it all just falls apart The controversy about the sources also goes hand in hand with my next point2 Repetition Yes, I know this is non fiction, it s not designed to be a page turner Still, there is something to be said for readability The second half of the book is extremely hard to get through In addition, the authors seem concerned with persuading readers to share their opinions than in allowing them to reach their own, and this is probably why everything seems so repetitive Again, it felt like rather than letting the facts speak for themselves, the authors were determined to get readers onside with their views It was fine at first obviously authors write to share their opinions but just got to be too much later on BONUS Try and count how many times they use the phrase the fate of the Romanovs I know how hard it is to reword things, but if you find yourself repeating a phrase than a handful of times you should really just cut itby then the audience has usually got your point.3 Gruesome descriptions Obviously, this depends on the reader s tolerance, and there is always the option to skip I just have an annoying need to read all of a book , but the chapter describing the murder was extremely graphic This might not count as an official con, and I can definitely see the academic value but as this is a review of my personal thoughts, I m putting this down Be warned.Overall, I can see why this book wasn t well received For non Romanov buffs, there s just too much information to wade through without some background knowledge Many sections of the book are meant to challenge the established facts without having fully described them first, leaving an unbalanced narrative for newbies For Romanov fans , the book seems to be a personal attack the authors repeatedly scorn those interested in the royal family As I said above, I can agree with some of their points, and now that I m older than I first was when I became interested in the Romanovs I can appreciate a flawed description of them However, I really do think that this wave of idolism described by the authors is typical of anyone with a newfound obsession I m thinking of myself and other HP fans who have slowly been disillusioned by JKR It s easy to be drawn to this beautiful family with a tragic fateand having lived so long ago it s easy to turn them into something like fictional characters Eventually though, as one reads , one s view becomes nuanced Having said that, it s hard to swallow the authors dislike for the royal family when contrasted with their obvious sympathy for Yurovsky Again, it comes back to the whole persuasion thingit s fine working a little in, but non fiction should be facts than anything else If there s one thing this book teaches you, it s that history is a headache With so many conflicting stories, it s hard to figure out the Truth I don t regret reading it, and despite my problems with it I did still like it and think it does have a lot of good stuff to bring to the table for any seasoned Romanov buff Try it and see what you think

  4. says:

    Rather lurid account of the final days of Tsar Nicholas and his family Obviously, there are details here than in previous books because this book was written post Glasnost and the authors had access to information about the royal family than authors have had in the past If you like true crime, this will definitely keep you turning the pages up to the murder and through the cover up The book loses focus after that, rambling on and on about the difficulties of getting credible information and making speculations with what little info they had With the recent discovery and identification of the final two sets of royal remains some of the book s conjectures are proven false If you like biography, well, this is one viewpoint about the Romanovs, albeit not the most charitable one My opinion the book succeeds in conveying the tragedy and ultimate meaninglessness of the murder of the royal family much so than previous works The haphazard and horrific manner in which each met their end, the disgusting way their bodies were mistreated and finally disposed of, the subsequent cover up of not only the crime but of their very existence from modern Russian history it s all such a dreadful comedy of errors, a comedy of the blackest kind, ending in the inexplicable modern day canonization of the family you couldn t make this stuff up And that s why I enjoy reading history.

  5. says:

    This has to be one of the most detailed and footnoted books I have every come across The appendices, footnotes, bibliography, and index runs to over 100 pages Mind you the book itself runs to over 600 pages This give an incredibly detailed and at times confusing look at at the last days of the Russian Imperial Family It helps if you have pen and paper to keep track of all the players This is not for someone just wanting to read a quick history of the Imperial Family s murder One of the most interesting things about the book is the showing both the positive and good of the Imperial Family and of the men that help them The authors take great pains to show that the men that were guarding the Imperial Family while did do some horrible things to them, many were young boys just picked at random from the local factory and grew admire and have some empathy to the Romanovs The authors pulls no punches in describing the deification of Nicholas and his family in the intervening years and especially after the fall of the Soviet Union On the whole, I would recommend this book but caution that this is not for a casual reader of the Romanovs.

  6. says:

    I decided to read this book as a compliment to one that we re reading for book club Silence of God I wanted something that would give me a bit information about Russia during the first world war I think I found it.While some of this was long winded and I found myself skimming for multiple pages, I was fascinated at the political and religious influences on what should have been a very carefully handled scientific investigation But that s me talking as an American.I had multiple passages that I had to share with my husband often after he d gone to sleep or just as he was waking and I d spent all night with the details invading my dreams I d have to open it back up and see if I d read things correctly.This is a very thorough evaluation of what happened to the Romanovs both in what lead them to captivity and in what happened after they were dead.Well done

  7. says:

    I visited Russia in 2006 and became fascinated with the story of the deaths of the Romanovs This book detailed the decline of this Russian dynasty and the last days of the Romanov family As there were many things occuring during this time in the history of russia, the book is very long, and addresses many events and introduces you to many people It can get a little confusing but keep plugging away as it is very interesting.

  8. says:

    Very good writing and research combined with a gripping story I am by way of being a Romanov nut, and Penny Wilson and Greg King have come up with a definitive look at the last months of Nicholas and Alexandra, their five children and assorted servants.

  9. says:

    Good book though after extensive research accuracy doesn t hold up very well Especially the chapter on yurovsky.

  10. says:

    If I could give this book two different sets of ratings, I d be very happy to do so The first roughly 350 pages of the original hardcover edition are an excellent, well researched history of the final days of the Romanovs based on extensive historical documentation There is only two truly controversial points during that first section the first regarding the trip the three Grand Duchesses Olga, Tatiana, and Anastasia took on the steamship Rus to Ekaterinberg the second regarding Marie s actions on her birthday during the final captivity of the family With regard to the trip on the Rus and Marie s birthday, and why how both events are reported in this book is so controversial, I do believe much of the controversy has to do with the hagiography of the family which developed after their murders My personal thoughts on the controversies around this book are behind this spoiler space view spoiler King and Wilson imply, but do not actively state and base their opinion on statements also obliquely implying this interpretation made by members of the family s suite household which traveled on the Rus with them that one or of the girls were sexually harassed, if not actually raped, on the overnight steamer trip Considering the times, such an assault would not have been unusual They also imply, but do not state, that Marie was caught in a compromising position perhaps she was finally exploring her sexuality with one of the guards at Ipatiev House Again, they base this on oblique statements made by people who were around the family in those final days With the late twentieth century canonization of the Romanov Family by both branches of the Russian Orthodox church, any signs of humanity in these young women, or even apparently the thought of them as sexual beings capable of being perhaps raped or seduced, has been erased beneath the myth of the family as a model of the perfect Christian family hide spoiler

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *