[Epub] ➝ The Ethics of Liberty By Murray N. Rothbard – Saudionline.co.uk

The Ethics of Liberty pdf The Ethics of Liberty, ebook The Ethics of Liberty, epub The Ethics of Liberty, doc The Ethics of Liberty, e-pub The Ethics of Liberty, The Ethics of Liberty c31f3f605eb In Recent Years, Libertarian Impulses Have Increasingly Influenced National And Economic Debates, From Welfare Reform To Efforts To Curtail Affirmative Action Murray N Rothbard S Classic The Ethics Of Liberty Stands As One Of The Most Rigorous And Philosophically Sophisticated Expositions Of The Libertarian Political PositionWhat Distinguishes Rothbard S Book Is The Manner In Which It Roots The Case For Freedom In The Concept Of Natural Rights And Applies It To A Host Of Practical Problems An Economist By Profession, Rothbard Here Proves Himself Equally At Home With Philosophy And While His Conclusions Are Radical That A Social Order That Strictly Adheres To The Rights Of Private Property Must Exclude The Institutionalized Violence Inherent In The State His Applications Of Libertarian Principles Prove Surprisingly Practical For A Host Of Social Dilemmas, Solutions To Which Have Eluded Alternative TraditionsThe Ethics Of Liberty Authoritatively Established The Anarcho Capitalist Economic System As The Most Viable And The Only Principled Option For A Social Order Based On Freedom This Edition Is Newly Indexed And Includes A New Introduction That Takes Special Note Of The Robert Nozick Rothbard Controversies


10 thoughts on “The Ethics of Liberty

  1. says:

    This was a bit of a disappointment Perhaps it s too seminal for its own good Reminds me of the old joke about students criticizing Shakespeare plays for being chock full of clich s The joke obviously being that the causality is reversed Shakespeare INVENTED a lot of the phraseology of contemporary English And the same goes for Rothbard he invented, or at least popularized, a lot of the terminology of contemporary libertarian philosophy, so he might seem clich d and simple in retrospective, when we have experience of several decades of post Rothbardian liberal theory.But time is not the full reason for my disappointment, nor does it excuse his simplicity to the extent that some apologists might claim I cannot get over the fact that I was expecting a substantial and philosophically honest exposition of liberty from a natural rights perspective I have listened to some of Rothbard s lectures and found him to be an engaging speaker So I wanted to believe that he was also a good philosopher Instead, Rothbard offers an all too brief natural rights account of property rights, liberty, homesteading and the non aggression principle He extends these principles dogmatically and unwaveringly to the whole realm of human interaction, but since the foundations of the edifice are merely repeated from page to page, the entire credibility of his argument hinges on the first couple of chapters And there isn t much there.I believe that his foundations are left underdeveloped The logically deduced structure, however majestic and grand, is left, inexplicably, without proper intellectual bodyguards, beyond a few underpaid foot soldiers whom a stronger army can eat for breakfast In other words, if you wish to have a leitmotif to carry a 3 hour opera, you better have a good one And his is only OK The whole edifice of rights becomes dubious as a consequence This is especially true when it comes to the difficult cases, like the lifeboat dilemma, shouting fire in a crowded theatre, or children s rights His answers are occasionally interesting, always logical, but mostly simple minded He does introduce some wonderfully radical proposals which make a lot of sense, but I wish he could argue for them from a robust standpoint One does not have to be a convinced rule utilitarian, like I am, and like many classical liberals have been, to see major problems with his philosophy Even natural rights have better exponents, starting with John Locke himself, whom Rothbard mangles for his own purposes, thus simplifying philosophical issues down to the basics Considering that everything is supposed to flow from simple premises, too little work is being done to ward off criticisms Of course, the Shakespeare fallacy is partially applicable here, too, since a lot of the criticism was fleshed out only decades later, but compared to contemporary works like Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Rothbard s grasp of the complexities of philosophical argumentation seems tame and lame He fights straw men when he can, he doesn t give a fair hearing to the other side, and he introduces freshman level, hyperbolic counterarguments to utilitarianism and other alternative theories, as if he was the first man to come up with such stuff.The style of the book straddles the fine line between lucid and simplistic It could be praised for the clarity of its arguments But it should also be attacked for the simplicity of its logical steps They are watertight only in the carefully constructed world of ideal theory the crystal palaces of libertarian heaven But reality seeps in The best laid plans of mice and Rothbard only take us so far Natural rights are a potentially super powerful tool of philosophy that demand better exposition There was a time when I might have been impressed by a theory that seems to provide answers to all circumstances It is good to have a theory that can be appealed to in all possible circumstances, but it is not a virtue of a theory that is provides easy answers Any dogmatic theory, indeed, can be applied in an infinity of circumstances A theory that explains everything explains nothing And a morality that refuses the possibility of tragedy and conflict on the very fundamental level of human interaction is a morality that is psychologically pleasing but sociologically and politically dangerous I personally think that liberty should best be defended on a utilitarian basis, but a type of utilitarianism that takes rights and the inviolability of borders seriously as tools of welfare But even if one believes in natural rights, one should do so after a careful exposure to its theory and the objections raised against it This book fails to provide a good summary of either Rothbard gives us gorgeous sand castles, towering over the 20th century beach of ideas, majestically But a tide is soon coming a spectre is haunting Europe , a tide of philosophical A listers on all sides of the aisle, so I would urge readers to close their eyes, turn around, and look elsewhere for shelter.


  2. says:

    The absurd silliness of libertarianism is well known, so I don t need to reproduce it here Instead, I m going to focus on the incredibly awful writing style For example, here are the very first two sentences of this awful, long winded mess Among intellectuals who consider themselves scientific, the phrase the nature of man is apt to have the effect of a red flag on a bull Man has no nature is the modern rallying cry and typical of the sentiment of political philosophers today was the assertion of a distinguished political theorist some years ago before a meeting of the American Political Science Association that man s nature is a purely theological concept that must be dismissed from any scientific discussion It only gets worse from here.


  3. says:

    A masterpiece a rational basis for libertarian political philosophy, beginning with self ownership, the non aggression principle, and explaining how a free society would function in various situations, answering objections, and proposing a way forward.


  4. says:

    This book will really make you think long after you put the book down It will cut to the core of your personal views of right and wrong, the use of agency, and what is liberty I agreed with most of what he wrote, and the rest I don t necessarily disagree with, but still need to study it out Of course I totally disagree with his views on abortion and child abandonment This book will make you rethink and look deeper into the Golden Rule and how one would follow it.


  5. says:

    Particularly useful in this book was the chapters the went into commonly held contradictions by the left and right As well as the chapters where Rothbard gives a straight up philosophical smackdown of guys like Nozick, Hayek, and Mises on questions regarding ethics, specifically ethics regarding the state.


  6. says:

    This is an excellent next step book on Libertarianism, perfect for anyone who has a basic understanding of the philosophy but would like information and practical application of its principles to life s complicated and touchy issues The book takes the concepts of personal property and individual freedom and uses them as an ethical foundation for a myriad of common topics i.e the right to privacy, animal rights, taxation, voluntary contracts Rothbard, as always, presents clear and well thought arguments to justify his positions, but the reader should keep in mind that although his descriptions are philosophically sound, there are many opinions one may object to morally this however is another tenet of the book no justification for morality is implied, that is left up to you Overall, the book is a quick an enjoyable read and will certainly challenge most people s positions.


  7. says:

    Ethics of Liberty is my second read by Rothbard Although it didn t have the convincing persuasion of For A New Liberty, which is my favorite of his, it applies a sound ethical theory based soley on human rights and the nonagression principal to a diverse number of topics such as animal rights, bribery and theft The strict rational and application of theory without any moral guidance knocked me off my feet on the topic of abortion and childerns rights Like any good economist, Rothbard extracts all subjective value, moral guidance, from the theory itself of Ethics in the economic and political realm Lastly he critiques both Miss and Hayek on their policy assessments, concluding with his view of a world based on sound property rights, freedom and liberty.


  8. says:

    In this classic libertarian text, Rothbard dedicates most thorough and critical analysis to the theory of property rights, which is at the core of individual liberty Protecting property rights turns out much complicated than at first glance Rothbard sheds light on many of these complications, and at the same time raises controversial and new questions Nevertheless, after reading this book, I m motivated to study Again, a must read for not only aspiring libertarians but also those ready to possibly see their whole world uprooted.


  9. says:

    Ignore Hoppe, ignore the bits about children and the hand waving grounding of natural rights Very good application of libertarian rights theory.


  10. says:

    Murray Rothbard s not so excellent Libertarian adventureRothbard provides a few interesting crumbs to nibble on and understandably opposes excess State control, but he ll serve no meals for the philosophically hungry Instead, the reader ingests a pungent mix of purist fanaticism and immoral lunacy Such as, The parent may not murder or mutilate the child, writes Rothbard, But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e to let the child die And this applies to any child, because to do otherwise is coercion on the body of the parent There will be no moral expectations though he claims this is another matter , no belonging, no virtues, responsibility or duty levied on Rothbard s Man because all such community based notions are persecution of the sacred individual His conclusions are so wrong, in part because his foundational definition of the human is so blatantly errant While asking how must we behave, implying we are not alone in the universe, his political philosophy constantly implies in Libertarian fashion we are quite alone in the universe In his crosshairs are the State naturally invented for protection and organization in a world of than one , and laws generally as implementations of justice and order in a world of than one Not only is his model impossible to implement in the real world, it would be a disaster to try Rand Paul should burn his copy of this occasionally self contradictory, and frequently repellent text.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *